Classifying Workers
Learn the rules for employees vs. contractors.
Worker Classification
Table of Contents
This web page contains the following major sections.
- Information from the IRS and Congress
- Joint Committee on Taxation Reports
- GAO Reports
- Treasury Department
- National Taxpayer Advocate Reports
- Information from the Department of Labor & NLRB
- Legislative Proposals and Hearings
- Selected State Information
- Modern Economy Matters
- Articles
Introduction
If an employer has the right to control the worker's work—how and what he does—the worker is an employee. If not, generally, the worker is an independent contractor. The employer's tax treatment of each is different, and the workers have different tax rules that apply to them. For example, a contractor can deduct her business expenses against her business income, while an employee must treat them as miscellaneous itemized deductions only deductible to the extent that category of deductions exceeds 2% of AGI.
This website, created and maintained by Professor Annette Nellen, includes links to information from the IRS and other government agencies on worker classification matters. There are also links to legislative proposals to improve the worker classification rules.
Information from the IRS and Congress
- IRS website on employment taxes
- IRS Overview to 3 Classification Factors (based on 20 common law factors):
- Independent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee?
- Exhibit D from Business Consultants Audit Techniques Guide
- IRS Pub 4902 on Cosmetology and Barber Industry
- FS 2015-21 (August 2015) - Payments to Independent Contractors
- IRS Notice 989 - Commonly Asked Questions When IRS Determines Your Work Status as "Employee
- Employment Tax Publications
- List of IRS videos for employers
- Video - Payments to Independent Contractors (8/19/15)
- Publication 15 (Circular E), Employer's Tax Guide
- Publication 15-A (or pdf) - worker classification, wages, other compensation, reporting, common paymaster, and more
- FSA 200127004 - Notes IRS use of three factor approach - (1) Behavioral control, (2) Financial control, and (3) Relationship of the parties.
- Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding
- Revenue Ruling 87-41 (20 common law factors explained) - summarized by JCT
- Section 530 (see page 1-51 of the IRS Training Materials (10/96))
- Revenue Procedure 85-18 interpreting Section 530
- Revenue Ruling 81-224 interpreting Section 530 when Forms 1099 were not filed
- Section 530 history by Weissman (Feb 2009)
- IRC Section 3509 - Determination of employer's liability for certain employment taxes
- CCA 200825043 - use of Section 3509 after an IRS determination letter (such as following an SS-8 review)
- CCA 200038045 - use of section 530 or 3509 for corporate officer misclassification
- Rev. Rul. 2009-39 - correcting employment tax errors
- Statutory employee - IRS Information
- Form 8919, Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages
- IRM 21.6.4.4.15.1 - Misclassified Workers to File Form 8919
- Leased employees - see information in Pub 560 and IRC Section 414(n)
- Internal Revenue Manual (IRM):
- IRM 4.23 Employment Tax (numerous topics covered in this section; a few are listed below)
- IRM 4.23.5 Technical Guidelines for Employment Tax Issues - includes info on how Section 530 factors into the audit (including that examiner is to first ask employer if Section 530 requirements are met
- IRM 4.23.17 Preparer Penalty Procedures for SB/SE Employment Tax
- IRM 4.23.18 - Coordinating Worker Classification Determinations Between SS-8 Program and Exam
- IRM 4.8.10 - Notice of Determination of Worker Classification
- IRM 5.1.24 Third-Party Payer Arrangements for Employment Taxes
- IRS Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP)
- Announcement 2012-46
- Announcement 2012-45
- IR-2011-95 (9/21/11) news release
- Information from IRS - General information + FAQs
- Announcement 2011-64
- Form 8952, Application for Voluntary Classification Settlement Program + Instructions
- FAQs
- TIGTA report released 9/24/14 on problems with the program
- Classification Settlement Program (CSP) - for when taxpayer is under exam
- MOU for Information Sharing and Strategizing Between the IRS and DOL (Sept 2011)
Joint Committee on Taxation Reports
- Present Law and Background Relating to Worker Classification for Federal Tax Purposes (JCX-26-07), May 7, 2007
- Present Law and Issues Related to Classification of Workers as Employees or Independent Contractors (JCX-23-96), June 3, 1996
- Description And Analysis Of Proposals Relating To Worker Classification And The Tax Treatment Of Certain S Corporation Shareholders And Partners Scheduled for a Hearing Before the Senate Committee on Finance on May 3, 1994Â (JCX-6-94), May 2, 1994
GAO Reports
- Contingent Workforce: Size, Characteristics, Earnings, and Benefits (GAO-15-168R, 5/20/15)
- Employee Misclassification: Improved Coordination, Outreach, and Targeting Could Better Ensure Detection and Prevention, GAO-09-717, August 10, 2009
- Employee Misclassification: Improved Outreach Could Help Ensure Proper Worker Classification, GAO-07-859T, May 8, 2007
- Employment Arrangements: Improved Outreach Could Help Ensure Proper Worker Classification, GAO-06-656, July 11, 2006
- Issues in Classifying Workers as Employees or Independent Contractors, T-GGD-96-130, June 30, 1996
- Issues Involving Worker Classification, T-GGD-95-224, August 2, 1995
- Tax Administration: Improving Independent Contractor Compliance with Tax Laws, T-GGD-94-194 (8/4/94)
- Approaches for Improving Independent Contractor Compliance, GGD-92-108, July 23, 1992
- Senate Bill 2369, Independent Contractor Tax Classification and Compliance Act of 1982, 118202, April 26, 1982
Treasury Department
- TIGTA, Expansion of the Gig Economy Warrants Focus on Improving Self-Employment Tax Compliance, 2/14/19
- TIGTA, Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Actions Were Not Always Timely or Adequate (May 2014)
- TIGTA, Employers Continue to Classify Workers as Independent Contractors, Despite IRS Determinations to the Contrary, July 29, 2013
- TIGTA, Employment Tax Compliance Could Be Improved With Better Coordination and Information Sharing, March 23, 2010
- TIGTA, While Actions Have Been Taken to Address Worker Misclassification, an Agency-Wide Employment Tax Program and Better Data Are Needed (2/04/2009)
- PERAB Tax Reform report includes tax gap proposal on Worker Classification – page 60
National Taxpayer Advocate Reports
- NTA 2003Â page 256Â - suggesting a modified withholding approach for certain contractors
- NTA 2008Â page 375 - proposals for simplification
- NTA 2013Â page 197Â - problems with SS-8 processing and repeat of simplification suggestion for classification
- UK Classification Tool mentioned by NTA
Information from the Department of Labor & NLRB
- Contingent workforce
- Plan/Prevent/Protect project
- Fact Sheet #13:Â Employment Relationship Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Who is an employee (explanation of various classification tests)
- DOL 1999 report -Â Futurework - Trends and Challenges for Work in the 21st Century
- NLRB - Information and links on dismissal of the petition by Northwestern University football players to unionize -Â 13-RC-121359; 8/17/15.
Legislative Proposals and Hearings
- S. 1687 and H.R. 4611Â (113th Congress) - Payroll Fraud Prevention Act
- S. 1706 and H.R. 4503Â (113th Congress) - Fair Playing Field Act
- H.R. 6128Â (111th Congress) - Fair Playing Field Act of 2010 - "to permit the Secretary of the Treasury to issue prospective guidance clarifying the employment status of individuals for purposes of employment taxes and to prevent retroactive assessments with respect to such clarifications."
- H.R. 3408Â (111th Congress) - Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act of 2009 - "to modify the rules relating to the treatment of individuals as independent contractors or employees, and for other purposes."
- Senate HELP Committee hearing on June 17, 2010 - Leveling the Playing Field: Protecting Workers and Businesses affected by Misclassification
Selected State Information
California
- California Employment Development Department (EDD)
- EDD information ABC Labor Law test of AB 5 effective 1/1/20
- Dept. of Industrial Relations - main page + AB 5 FAQs
- FTB AB 5 information
- DE 44 - California Employer's Guide
- DE 38 - Employment Determination Guide (contains a helpful set of questions) [not updated for AB 5]
- DE230 - form for worker to use to ask EDD about their classification [not updated for AB 5]
- DE 1870 - form for employer to get EDD assistance in classifying worker [not updated for AB 5]
- DE 573M - Independent Contractors Misconceptions Brochure [not updated for AB 5]
- DE 231i - Information Sheet on classifying workers in services industries [not updated for AB 5]
- DE 231TA - Employment Tax Audit Process [not updated for AB 5]
- DE 40 - Tax Audit Guidelines [not updated for AB 5]
- California Employer Newsletter
- Forms, Publications and Information Sheets
- Regulations under Title 22 - NOTE: Changed due to enactment of AB 5 effective 1/1/20
- 4304-1 - Employee Defined
- Per DE 40 - "Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Sections 4304.2 through 4304-12, sets forth specific application of the common law rules for specific industries. These regulations must be addressed when making employee vs. independent contractor status determinations involving a type of worker or service. The following types of services are addressed:
- Real Estate Salespeople (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304.2)
- Home Health Care (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304.3)
- Computer Services (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-4)
- Artists (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-5)
- Newspaper Distribution (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-6)
- Product Demonstrators (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-7)
- Security Dealers (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-8)
- Language Interpreters (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-9)
- Amateur Athletic Officials (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-10)
- Process Servers (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-11)
- Barbering and Cosmetology (Title 22, CCR, Section 4304-12)"
- California Labor Code Section 2753and 226.8 as changed by SB 459 (2011) to impose penalty for knowlingly advising someone to treat an employee as a contractor or doing so
Connecticut Department of Revenue
Minnesota
New York
- Basic info from the NY Dept of Labor
Oregon
- FAQs about independent contractors (includes nice chart on varying classification rules)
Texas Workforce Commission
- Independent Contractor Tests (economic reality, ABC, others) - a helpful summary of the various tests
Vermont
- Vermont Department of Labor - ABC test explained
Modern Economy Matters
- Rulings on worker classification for labor law matters from District Court - No. Calif (March 2015)
- Both provide a good overview of how these companies operate and the challenges of fitting the drivers into either the employee or contractor slot.
- Cotter v. Lyft, Inc., No. 13-cv-04065-VC (3/11/15)
- O'Connor v Uber Technologies, Inc., et al, No. C-13-3826 EMC (3/11/15)
- Both provide a good overview of how these companies operate and the challenges of fitting the drivers into either the employee or contractor slot.
- California Labor Commission ruling of June 2015 that ex-Uber driver is an employee
- 21st Century Taxation Blog 6/20/15 post
- Ruling (posted at LA Times website)
- Robert Reich, "Why We're All Becoming Independent Contractors," Huffington Post, 2/22/15
Articles
- Failure to Innovate: Tax Compliance and the Gig Economy Workforce, by Bruckner and Nellen, Tax Notes, 5/20/19
- Information on Form 1099-MISC from Bench Company (posted with permission)
- Renewed Focus on Worker Classification, AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider, 8/26/10
- Worker Classification - Is Congress Ready to Take Action?, AICPA Tax Insider, 12/13/07
- Articles from Robert S. Schriebman
- "The Common Law Employer Test and he Affordable Care Act - Will Businesses Be Responsible for Temporary Employees Assigned by Staffing Firms?" by Bianchi and Lenz, Tax Management Memorandum, BloombergBNA, Feb. 2014
- ABA Tax Section, Comments on potential changes to Rev. Rul. 69-184 (that treats partners as non-employees), 12/9/19
- "Partners as Employees? Properly Reporting Partner Compensation," by Noel Brock, The Tax Adviser, 11/1/13.
- "Treating partners as employees: Risks to consider," by Noel Brock, Journal of Accountancy, August 2014"
- McGladrey submits comments on treatment of partners as employees," 8/5/14 (letter to IRS and Treasury)